New Delhi: Attorney General Okay Okay Venugopal has declined his consent for starting up prison contempt of courtroom lawsuits towards Bollywood actor Swara Bhasker for her alleged “derogatory and scandalous” statements towards the Supreme Court over the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case verdict. The consent of both the Attorney General or the Solicitor General is important, beneath phase 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for starting up contempt lawsuits towards an individual.
Lawyer Anuj Saxena, on behalf of petitioner Usha Shetty, had sought consent of the Attorney General for starting up contempt motion towards the actor. Venugopal, in a two-page letter to Saxena on August 21, stated the actor’s “statement in the first part appears to be a factual one, and is a perception of the speaker”.
After being denied nod by means of the Attorney General to start up the contempt lawsuits towards the actor, the petitioner moved a identical plea earlier than Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in search of his consent, her attorneys stated. In his letter, Venugopal stated, “The comment refers to the judgement of the Supreme Court, and is not an attack on the institution. This does not offer any comment on the Supreme Court itself or say anything that would scandalise or tend to scandalise, or lower or tend to lower the authority of the Supreme Court. In my opinion, the statement does not constitute criminal contempt.”
He said the second part of the statement is a vague statement not related to any particular court, and “one thing is so basic that no person would take any severe word of this remark”. Venugopal said, “I do not think that this is a case where the offence of scandalising the court or lowering the authority of the court would arise. I therefore decline consent to initiate contempt proceedings…” On August 18, the plea filed earlier than the Attorney General by means of recommend Mahek Maheshwari, who along side attorneys Anuj Saxena and Prakash Sharma, has alleged that Bhasker made those statements at a panel dialogue on February 1, 2020 organised by means of the Mumbai Collective. It claimed that Bhasker had made “derogatory and scandalous” statements towards the courts within the nation and discussed the Ayodhya case judgement.
The petition intends to start up prison contempt lawsuits towards Bhasker for “passing a derogatory and scandalous statement in context of the Supreme Court of India on February 1, 2020 at a panel discussion organised by Mumbai Collective,” it stated. A five-judge charter bench of the apex courtroom had on November nine closing 12 months delivered a unanimous verdict paving the way in which for development of a Ram temple on the disputed web page in Ayodhya and had directed the Centre to allot a five-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for development a mosque.
[videos] => Array
[query] => https://pubstack.nw18.com/pubsync/v1/api/videos/recommended?source=n18english&channels=5d95e6c378c2f2492e2148a2,5d95e6c278c2f2492e214884,5d96f74de3f5f312274ca307&categories=5d95e6d7340a9e4981b2e10a&query=Ram+Janmabhoomi-Babri+Masjid+Case%2Csupreme+court%2Cswara+bhasker&publish_min=2020-08-20T23:53:45.000Z&publish_max=2020-08-23T23:53:45.000Z&sort_by=date-relevance&order_by=0&limit=2